Like or Dislike: 6  0

Like or Dislike: 1  1

thanks for your comment. I’ve tried to address your Japanese point in today’s post. Let me know you think.

Re: the iPhone. Of course it’s worth mentioning as we say that in the dossier, that it was designed by a British guy, Jonathan Ive, whose vision was then implemented by companies from over thirty countries across the world. A great example of the power of globalisation.

Like or Dislike: 3  0

Like or Dislike: 0  5

How much per person has been spent on the folly of Iraq and Afganistan, not to mention the bail out of financial institutions?

Hot debate. What do you think? 9  1

Hang on, most of this posting makes no sense at all. To take one example, why would component prices soar if the UK adopted a policy of import substitution? You seem to be suggesting that other countries would apply tariffs to their exports of those components, something which makes no sense at all. A bit lilke the posting, come to think of it.

Secondly, this is supposed to be an anti-BNP blog, am I correct? I mean, you are not a bunch of BNPers in disguise are you? The point is that the party is putting forward what is basically the old Alternative Economic Strategy from Sailor Jim’s time. Now that policy is aimed at people in places like Salford and Nelson, places that have been done over by the maggot and globalisation.

Your critique of the policy is crap. Ergo the policy looks better and better to the people that it is aimed at. I mean if a bunch of Tory whiners, headed by a bum sucking scab, can’t pick holes in the thing then it must be kosher – see what I mean?

“Vote BNP – get a job” That was not your aim, but that is the message that you are sending out. Nice work boys.

Hot debate. What do you think? 9  1

Like or Dislike: 6  1

Like or Dislike: 6  0

PS. I had to laugh at your picture of the iPhone. In 1980’s Britain led the way producing cheap, good quality computers, these computers were more affordable and better quality than any foreign competitor, yet the tory government did nothing to protect our own home-grown computing industry!

So we ended up paying over the odds for japanese and american rubbish…

Now the americans have complete hegemonic domination over the computing industry thanks to tory free market policies!

Hot debate. What do you think? 10  1

Bearing in mind the new commenting rules I’ll keep this as brief and on-subject as possible

BNP economic policy urges Britain to be as economically self-sufficient as possible, it seeks to emulate the economic model of the japanese.

A prime example being the nuclear industry, Britain led the way in developing nuclear energy, yet all new build reactors will be built by foreign companies – Eon, RWE, EdF etc. They will be built by low-paid foreign workers at the expense of the indigenous British workforce. Ultimately it is these foreign powers who will profit from British energy users.

How can that be good for the long-term British economy?

Another field Britain is letting go to the dogs is our military industry, instead of manufacturing guns, bombs, landmines and other weaponry to sell to other countries, our bleeding heart politicians would rather put our own people on the dole and these customers buy their arms from the french, russian, chinese or americans!

You seem to think – as your Cadbury article implies – that its a good thing for foreign companies to buy out our industry, pay off British workers, wind it down and move the whole operation overseas all for the sake of a few miserly shareholders making a quick buck!

Your false assertion of it costing £1,300 a head is balanced anyway by the BNP’s withdrawal of foreign aid, the EU, afghan war and countless other nonsensical wastes of money that this country is haemorrhaging at present.

Its simple economics – this country needs to become more of an exporter than an importer in order to balance the books, all the tories/labour/libs want to do to us as a nation is pull our pants down, make us bend over and let the whole world rape us, whilst a select few profiteer from it!

Hot debate. What do you think? 12  2