Nothing British is launching a new campaign on why there is nothing patriotic about voting for the BNP. This blog series will reclaim patriotism and British identity from the clutches of ethnic nationalists. It will show how rather than being patriotic – creating a common identity for all – the BNP is a party that seeks to divide Britain.
The BNP’s shameful use of respectable icons, symbols and institutions like Churchill, the Union Jack and the Church to cover up for the fact that it is a party mired in corruption, criminality and violence is a disgrace.
In no particular order, our new series will show how in Britain there is nothing British about:
- Exploiting wounded soldiers and veterans for political capital.
- Denigrating the contribution of non-white soldiers.
- Admiring the enemies of Britain.
- Selling out British interests to foreign extremists.
- Abusing the Queen and the Royal Family.
- Using authoritarian and wealth-destroying ideas from the Continent.
- Roughing up journalists.
- Tolerating misogyny, sexism and homophobia.
- Sneering at injustice.
- Accepting anti-Christian behaviour.
- Romancing foreign fascists.
- Denigrating our heritage.
- Breaking the law.
- Destroying individual identities through collectivisation.
- Dividing our country.
- Isolating Britain from our friends.
Patriotism, as George Orwell defined it, is a “devotion to a particular place and a particular way of life, which one believes to be the best in the world but has no wish to force on other people.”
The BNP, however, is not devoted to our “particular” way of life. It is committed to its own hate-filled, racialized version of Britishness. Nick Griffin’s political vision is un-patriotic. It looks backward not forward. It is closed not open. And it is divided not united.
During the European elections nearly 1 million British voters were so concerned about their future they decided to vote for Nick Griffin and the British National Party. For a country that is a tolerant and respectful believing in fair-play, this was deeply shocking.
Nothing British’s Policy Focus series has already exposed the BNP’s loony policies and shows how Nick Griffin - among other things – would:
- Cost jobs, particularly amongst the working classes.
- Push up prices and reduce choices for consumers.
- Divide Britain into an apartheid state.
- Isolate us from the our friends around the world.
Put simply: this series will show how voting for the BNP is about as British as voting for Sinn Fein, Anjem Choudhury or Fidel Castro
Tags: vote
Vote for Zionist Israeli interests, vote for the 3 in 1 pro -EU, immigration, MMGW clap-trap, illegal war party, vote for more of the same, you know you love it. The internationalist Bilderberg boys have your interests at heart, come cattle, landless peasant slaves, vote LAB LIB CON MAN.
Hot debate. What do you think?
22 
5
Thank you for a classic piece of vacuous Griffinism.
I’d love to see you try to sell these conspiracy theories door to door in an election campaign. It would be hilarious!
In my experience people worry about pot-holes, local schools, litter and noisy teenagers. Next time I’m out with some leaflets I’ll have to ask someone how worried they are about the “Bildeberg Boys”.
Oh, why did you forget to mention the Freemasons and the reptilian shape-shifters? Surely it’s their fault too.
Hot debate. What do you think?
1 
16
This is beyond reason, please explain how voting for the mainstream politicians is in any way, shape or form “British”?
All the mainstream want more immigration, more integration into the EU monolith, more globalisation, more versions of one world government.
James & co support or (did) work for a man who doesn’t even believe in the concept of nationality, much less the idea of a Britain even existing or loyalty to a particular nation.
Hot debate. What do you think?
25 
2
It’s a bit like the Sinn Fein exhortations to hate Britons as anything else would be un-Irish!
Hot debate. What do you think?
12 
2
“1.Exploiting wounded soldiers and veterans for political capital.”
I do not believe the BNP “EXPLOITED” soldiers.
Their support , I believe is genuine.
At least they have not sent any soldiers to their deaths in a war which , according to that Foreign Office lawyer chappy , is illegal.
“2.Denigrating the contribution of non-white soldiers.”
Their criticism of Johnson Beharry , VC , was wrong.
The nasty rumour that they took a stance against the Gurkhas , however ,was not true : the S-n published a retraction.
“3.Admiring the enemies of Britain.”
Who are they ?
“4.Selling out British interests to foreign extremists.”
Unlike the Conservatives under Thatcher?
Even former PM MacMillan likened her policies to “selling off the family silver”.
I admired Maggie and voted for her – including ‘83 when my X was one that got John Wheeler over the line by the narrowest of margins.
But she did not foresee the downside with privatisation.
“5.Abusing the Queen and the Royal Family.”
Comment by one “blogger” tarnishes the entire party ?
I think we should call a truce – else we could criticise ALL parties for the words / actions of a minority of their members/supporters.
“6.Using authoritarian and wealth-destroying ideas from the Continent.”
I quite like the “authoritarian” bit.
“7.Roughing up journalists”.
Ok – Nick said / Dom said etc.etc – I don’t know who’s told the truth.
“8.Tolerating misogyny, sexism and homophobia.”
When?
“9.Sneering at injustice.”
I have seen them fighting AGAINST injustice :
not sure how they’ve “sneered” at it.
“10.Accepting anti-Christian behaviour.”
Religion and politics should be kept apart.
But if we must mix the two – the BNP think supporting an illegal war is
un-Christian.
“11.Romancing foreign fascists.”
I’m a working-class boy from a coal-mining town : I can’t comment on “Romance”:-)
“12.Denigrating our heritage.”
How ?
“13.Breaking the law.”
Oh dear-if we want to talk about criminal activity in politics , we’d need another dedicated website !
Time fer me cup o’ cocoa ‘n pills , so I’ll leave it at 13 .
Hot debate. What do you think?
22 
1
Don’t hold your breath for a detailed reply from NB, Nicholas. In the army, they would be referred to as “Rumour Control”.
Still, at least your post was allowed. They allow some dissent – it gives an illusion of an open conversation.
Hot debate. What do you think?
18 
1
Good luck with your campaign NB. I like the sound of it.
Please think seriously about printing off some leaflets / postcards and putting them up for sale on your site.
Hot debate. What do you think?
4 
19
Why don’t you buy their report about B&H, it’s only a fiver?
Hot debate. What do you think?
13 
1
I’m confused. Surely the 16 points plus 4 refer to the dystopia we are experiencing now. Don’t worry, all you lovely people at NB, you’re preaching to the converted. I won’t cast an anti British vote. I wouldn’t dream of voting for Brown or Dave or Cleggy.
Hot debate. What do you think?
23 
2
I sure as hell won’t either!
Hot debate. What do you think?
17 
1
“Patriotism, as George Orwell defined it, is a “devotion to a particular place and a particular way of life, which one believes to be the best in the world but has no wish to force on other people.”
This quote takes the biscuit, in fact the whole packet, the mainstream politicians don’t believe in that concept at all, otherwise why are we pushing “Democracy” on Afghanistan etc?
This site has more front than Sainsbury’s & more brass balls than a whole street of pawnbrokers for even quoting that.
I believe in that concept but you lot don’t.
Hot debate. What do you think?
20 
0
Yes WTF – I’m also confused because I too thought that nationalism was now supposed to be a BAD thing.
Hot debate. What do you think?
16 
0
Just wondering, NB, what form your new campaign will take? Will it involve mobilising your army of supporters across the nation to leaflet, debate and engage with the public? Or will it be another series of blogs generated by the Tory propaganda machine but which are then immediately demolished by the few of us who get some amusement from this site.
PS. Your Alexa web ranking puts you at 871,680, compared to 33,595 for the BNP site, so it looks like you’ve got a challenge on your hands
Hot debate. What do you think?
21 
0
Let us hope that more visit the site. This is the best advert that I have seen for the BNP!
Hot debate. What do you think?
19 
0
James does C4 interviews not leaflet handing out!
Hot debate. What do you think?
14 
0
Exploiting the British Soldiers? How’s that? By stating that we want them home and not fighting a war for someone elses benifit. If anyones exploiting, it’s the Lib/Lab/Con conspiricy that’s using it to try and lift everyones falgging moral. Cameron and Brown with thier “oh so, we were just passing” photo oppertunities looking at Poppies on Rememberence Day. Now that was disgusting. Funny how it’s not thier sons and daughters out in Irag etc. Bet you Brown must be passed himself with the thought of the escalating problems of the Falklands. He’ll be trying to do another Maggie and get everyone jingoistic, hoping it will take everyones mind off the problem in hand. Also why do they call it the Defence Minister? I’ve never seen any defence since 1982
Hot debate. What do you think?
9 
0
Attack Minister?
Agressive War Minister?
Spreading democracy by force Minister?
Yes it doesn’t have quite the same PC ring to it.
Like or Dislike:
6 
0
How can any ethnic minority embrace the union jack?!!?
They were enslaved and slaughtered under it!
The union jack represents three patron saints of these islands, nothing to do with islam, judaism, sikhism, hinduism or any other religion…
Thats why our flag is an affront to them and always will be!!!
Hot debate. What do you think?
13 
2
NB bleats:
1. Cost jobs, particularly amongst the working classes.
2. Push up prices and reduce choices for consumers.
3. Divide Britain into an apartheid state.
4. Isolate us from the our friends around the world.
1. Rubbish!
2. More rubbish!
3. So what?!
4. Who are these friends you talk of… Imaginary no doubt!!!
Hot debate. What do you think?
8 
1
1. Labour did that already.
2. Remember “Rip off Britain.”
3. Already is going that way with Islamic areas.
4. Israel & America are giving the orders!
Like or Dislike:
7 
0
Well why do they want to come to Britain then?
I thought that the cultural marxist argument is that we are supposed to embrace multiculturalism because we are a mongrel race having been part of the Roman Empire for about 400years. I don’t run off cowering at the sight of the Italian flag. Do you?
Hot debate. What do you think?
9 
1
Is this thing working as my long winded reply is not being posted or is another case of Tory democracy in action?
Hot debate. What do you think?
10 
1
Nothing British your comment:
“The BNP’s shameful use of respectable icons, symbols and institutions like Churchill, the Union Jack and the Church to cover up for the fact that it is a party mired in corruption, criminality and violence is a disgrace”.
Hot debate. What do you think?
9 
2
Is that the Churchill who saw Gandi as a “Beastly upstart” and blacks as inferior or wrote about the “International Jew”? and is the Union Flag (Not Jack get it right) the same one that was thrown aside back in the 70’s by the ruling elite because they saw it as an embarressment only to be picked up by the National Front?
Hot debate. What do you think?
11 
1
And is it the same church that has swindled, killed, lied and subjacated it’s own followers for hundreds of years so that it would thrive and dominate?
Hot debate. What do you think?
7 
2
Whats going on with the posting on this site? Some have dissapeared, some have been split, some have been re-arranged. Blimey its just like the tory party
http://www.bnp.org.uk
Hot debate. What do you think?
10 
1
Your comment that “The BNP’s is a party mired in corruption, criminality and violence is a disgrace”. Not taking to account the expenses scandal. Since 2007 over 70 conservative councellors have been arrested and charged with rape, peadophillia, assault, drink driving, theft, bribery, drunkenness to name a few. Now who is thats the criminals?
http://www.bnp.org.uk
Hot debate. What do you think?
15 
1
The BNP is a clean sheet unlike the bent crowd in Westminster.Most of the Labour front bench are “Ex” card carrying communists,who sold us to a marxist EU that is un-elected and opporates in an un-democratic manner and rips off the expenses even more blatently than the trough meisters at Westminster.The EU auditors wouln`t sign off for over eleven years because of corruption.Twenty commissioners led by Kinnock were found to be fiddling but nothing was done except the “whistle blowers” sacked. Nick Griffin vows to get us out of this shambles,as well as the EU,Afghanistan and stuck with thousands of illegals.Thats why the BNP is the answer!
Hot debate. What do you think?
14 
1
That’s good enough for me!
Like or Dislike:
6 
0
The BNP clearly articulates its policy platform, without the bulls#@t of the other parties. Voters are not the dickheads that NB portray them; come election time they will respond to policy platforms accordingly.
Hot debate. What do you think?
11 
0
Have a read of this link to Liverpool BNP. It details the hard work put in by the local BNP activists before last week’s council by-election in Fazakerley, Liverpool.
http://merseysidebnp.blogspot.com/2010/02/last-of-leafleting-done-in-fazakerley.html
You are quite right AussieAl. The British people are not ****heads and did indeed “respond accordingly” to the BNP’s “policy platform”; the BNP lost nearly half its vote!
Like or Dislike:
0 
3
As a former serviceman,a former shop steward in the cwu, and presently the owner of a business and chairman of a residents assosciation,I will be urging every person i come into contact with to vote BNP i am not a woman hater(far from it),your website gives me laugh and makes me wonder why i ever joined the tory party.
Hot debate. What do you think?
8 
0
no wonder the unions are fecked with people like you
Like or Dislike:
0 
2
£5 is a bit steep for something thats only fit to wipe a dogs backside with!
Hot debate. What do you think?
8 
1
And is it the same church that has swindled, killed, lied and subjacated it’s own followers for hundreds of years so that it would thrive and dominate?
Hot debate. What do you think?
9 
2
This is why the BNP repeatedly say Churchill wouldn’t be welcome in mainstream politics today.
His non PC outbursts are largely airbrushed from history.
Hot debate. What do you think?
12 
1
Peter you are pooing your pants about the GE and the BNP/ukip, its ok, i get it, just keep telling the public you’ll fix the pot-holes, just say honestly, i will.
Hot debate. What do you think?
15 
1
Ah… “Voting!” At long last we are getting to the crux of what this site is really about. And which party might you suggest we all vote for instead Gentlemen?
*He says playfully pressing his index finger against his pursed lips while blinking bashfully in the direction of Tory Central Office*
Hot debate. What do you think?
13 
0
Camerons vote winners- pot-holes, rubbish and noisy kids.
Immigration, the Afghan war and the EU are just things crazy conspiracy theorists (whatever they are) worry about.
Hot debate. What do you think?
10 
1
Peter, what do you say to people when they ask, will your party keep giving money (£9 billion) to Pakistan, China and India, all nuclear countries 2 with space programs?
Do you waffle on about pot-holes and tell them not to worry their little heads about such matters and tell them they are racist if they think this country needs the money more?
Hot debate. What do you think?
10 
1
Lee Barnes seems a little unhappy today. He says the NF are going to stand a candidate in Barking.
That’s the BNP, NF and UKIP all scrapping over the same votes.
Like or Dislike:
0 
1
Funny enough people are waking up to the fact that things are a bit more joined together than they’re told, now that they wonder why things aren’t so good.
Like or Dislike:
5 
0