Migration debate: Must wider factors be taken into consideration when looking at its effects?

1950s Britain, Newcastle upon Tyne.

1950s Britain, Newcastle upon Tyne.

In the debate on migration, last week’s announcement by the Government’s Migration Advisory Panel (MAP)  that migrant workers displace Britons was a positive step forward.

However, governments must try harder to address the bona fide anxieties (cultural, social and economic) of ordinary, hard working voters. Otherwise there’s a risk of driving decent people of all backgrounds into the hands of hate filled political extremists, whose only offer are simple solutions to deeply complex issues.

Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

4 Responses to “Migration debate: Must wider factors be taken into consideration when looking at its effects?”

  1. Bill says:

    I agree, governments have for too long focused on economic factors and not enough on what it might mean for wider communities.

    This isnt racism, it’s just a difference in cultures, whether youre french, pakistani or australian. In my area, where i grew up, in Birmingham, it has changed a lot over teh years and I sometimes don’t recognise where I used to grow up. The BNP however make things worse by making out it is to do with race when it hasn’t.

    Keep up the good work.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Sam Pauli says:

    Migration is not new ,the irish ,the west indians,the asian community,the bnp focus on people fears….

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Bill Corr says:

    Britain NEEDS more immigrants from wonderful countries like Sudan, Somalia, Congo, Eritrea, Kurdistan …

    Postman Pat in the Home Office says so and he must be right, mustn’t he, chums!

    GOODTHINKFUL BRITONS DEMAND THE
    IMMIGRATION OF A MILLION MORE SOMALIS NOW!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Sam Pauli says:

    methinks bill is being sarcastic,

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0