The BNP’s Bizarre Understanding Of History

In an email to its members, the BNP compare themselves to the Allies during World War Two, and equate the “Establishment” (i.e. the EU, mainstream political parties and basically anybody who is not like the BNP) and “multiculturalism” to Nazis and Nazism.

In the words of the BNP: Our ancestors didn’t fight for “multiculturalism”, “political correctness” and the European Union. Politicians and mainstream society –
according to the BNP – are betraying the sacrifice of those heroes who gave their lives for this country during that period.

Quite simply, the BNP are wrong. The historical reasons as to why Britain and France went to war in September 1939 were to stand up to German military aggression and to honour our commitments to Poland, which was protected from German expansionism by a guarantee given by the Allies in April 1939.

Certainly multiculturalism and political correctness, which are well intentioned, have their faults, but the BNP are lying when they suggest that the veterans of WW2 (fought between the years 1939-1945) were prepared to lay down their lives to protect us from policies which have been implemented post-1945. This is a fatuous argument.

A country is entitled to pursue new policies after a war has been fought, and it does not mean that these “new” policies are contrary to the principles for which our
ancestors were fighting for.

Democratic societies are not static. They change over a period of time. This inevitably means that fresh policies have to be formulated in response to changed circumstances and new problems, which may not have been an issue at the time of war.

The anachronistic argument used by the BNP is as ridiculous as saying that “Agincourt wasn’t fought for a mega mosque to be built in London”. Or that “Sir Francis Drake didn’t fight the Spanish Armada for the Human Rights Act”. Both of these statements are obviously true, but only because “mega mosques” and the “Human Rights Act” were not on the agendas during the 15th and 17th centuries, respectively. They have become issues SINCE the 15th and 17th centuries.

However, one thing is certain: Britain, France, Russia and America did fight against German National Socialist aggression and were disgusted by the Nazi notion of pseudo-scientifically inspired racial supremacy – something which the BNP, to this very day, have enshrined in their constitution.

Tags: ,

Bookmark and Share

7 Responses to “The BNP’s Bizarre Understanding Of History”

  1. Diana says:

    Why I support the BNP -
    Comparing the BNP to Nazi party is like comparing a dwarf to a giant, there are some similarities, but there’s still a huge difference between them. For instance if the Germans had voted in the BNP rather then the Nazi party there wouldn’t of been a 2nd World War, nowhere have I seen that the BNP wish to create a totalitarian super human race to take over the world, have you? To the people who call the BNP and its supporters ‘fascist’ do they actually know what the word means? Look towards Labour, the EU and Islam for good examples of fascism, additionally I’ve never seen UAF protest against any of these. When the mainstream parties state that it’s a sad time for Britain as we’ve elected fascists when we fought to defeat fascists during the 2nd World War. Well I think you should ask yourselves if they would of bothered fighting and dying for this country when less then a century later we are now giving are towns, cities and country away.
    Immigration has gone through the roof under Labour, now in London the English feel like a foreigner their own country. Parts of the country are now heading towards ghettoization. Take Hackney for example, it now has display boards like those that can be found on motorways. Instead it states the number of drug dealers arrested in the last few weeks, no joke. Why’s Hackney now like that? Because it’s full of Africans. Africa’s a hellhole because it’s full of Africans, Hackney’s a hellhole because it’s full of Africans. The same can be said between other parts of the country East London, Birmingham, and Northern Cities and the connection between Pakistan. In London the 9% black population account for 40% of the knife crime. Nationally the 1.5% black population fill 15 % of the prisons, they commit a disproportionate amount of the gun, knife and rape crimes, fact. The hippie left like to state that this is because of poverty. Well this is a racist sentiment in itself. The only way to get out of poverty in a capitalist society is through hard work and intelligence, so blaming the crime rates on poverty is just as bad as saying that black people are lazy and stupid. People don’t just ‘magically change’ when they enter are boarders, 1/3 world people equal a 1/3 world country. Multiculturism is built on the false assumption that all races and cultures are equal, this is like stating that Europe is equal to Africa, when it obviously isn’t.
    A question the Sikhs and Hindus need to ask themselves is ‘what if the BNP capitulates and Islam is all over?’. A large proportion of them are in this country today as they fled their previous one due to Muslims, are they willing to let history repeat itself? The Muslim population is growing rapidly, it more then doubled within the last decade. With a fertility rate of 3.8, double that of the English, along with polygamy and the ability to bring in women from Pakistan, the Muslim population will continue to rise at an explosive rate. They state that Islam is a religion of peace, and you can clearly see that Islam brings terror wherever it goes. They state that not all Muslims are extremists, but Muslims breed and there’s only one version of the Koran. In a poll 100,000 Muslims declared they openly support Al Queda and feel the 9/11 and 7/7 bombing were justified. These people are living amongst us today and want to see us dead. There has been a ridiculous amount of both failed and successful acts of terrorism by the British born Muslim community within are country. The most well known are the 7/7 bombings. One of most deadly would have been an attempt by a Luton Muslim called Abu Munthir. He wanted to detonate a dirty bomb in this country and would have achieved his objective if the police hadn’t foiled his plans. How long till the next successful deadly attempt? It would be foolish to say that there won’t be any retaliation as there wasn’t last time. A lot of people will die and it will be entirely the fault of the left. Our government has made it clear that they are unwilling to expel nasty Muslim characters like Anjem Choudary from our county. Instead he lives on benefits paid by the British tax payer, and his very presence in our country could lead to the deaths of those same people who pay towards his benefits. This video outlines the dangers of a multicultural society – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnJcsQYZEGU
    The stupid and the brainwashed like to portray an image of a ‘final solution’ scenario occurring if there was ever to be a BNP government. Unlike Nazi Germany we live in a democracy, no one wants a Civil War with the 7 million non whites living in this country, no wants to live in a war zone. If this was to happen it would be likely that another hippie government would take over after the BNP, as no one would vote for the BNP again, let those who had been previously expelled back into the country, and they’d each be 20k richer anyway.
    Another important issue we are going to have to deal with is the fact that the total number of white people is declining, while the number of the all the other races are increasing. White people are less than 8% of world population and declining, we are a minority, and yet the majority still call us racist for trying to stop our race from being overrun, every race has a homeland (Asia is 99% Asian, Africa 99% African) but Europe is less than 40% European and declining from third world (mostly Muslim) races coming to work and intermarry and we are still made to take it. Our race is dying thanks to hip-hop and the ADL making white people feel guilty of saying they proud of being white.
    The whole world population is nearly 7 billion people and of that more than 70% are Indian/Asian, and on top of that rnb and hip-hop is making teenagers want to be black and trendy for blonde haired white girls to go out with black guys in high school because there’s no white pride, if you look into the future you will see the white race will die out, we black/brown/blonde haired whites are only 8% of world population and decreasing, media will realize this a bit too late just like they ignored the “global warming” phenomenon.
    40% of London is now non-white. Whites will be a minority group in Leicester by 2010, 2015 in Birmingham, and by 2025 in Oldham and Bradford. When will this stop? White people have the lowest fertility rate of all the races and cultures in this country at 1.8, while the ideal rate is 2.1 for the desired growth rate. At 1.8 are race, along with are culture will decline. As more and more unskilled foreigners enter this country more and more skilled Brits are leaving. 400,000 Brits left alone last year, in comparison 450,000 Brits died during the whole of World War 2. The same is happening in America, by 2050 it’s expected that white people will become a minority group, mainly due to Latino immigration. In Sweden Jens Orback, former Cabinet Minister for the Social Democrats, said during a radio debate that: “We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us.” The Swedish Social Democrats appear to have decided that the way to regain and maintain power is to import Muslim voters (which also appears to be a Labour tactic). They must be mad, when they become the minority Muslims will convert, kill and rape the lot of them (they already have the highest rape figures in Europe due to a recent influx of Muslim immigrants).
    It’s a precarious position being an ethnic minority. The Native Americans and the Aborigines now live on benefits because of it (but at least they fought back with their bows and arrows and spears and didn’t just allow it to happen) and we all know what happened to the Jews. The Germans hatred of the Jews was because of jealously, the Jews had the jobs, the money and businesses. There’s not a race without a story of what the white man has done to them. We’ve colonized and controlled others countries, enslaved and annihilated other races. If white people were to become a minority a similar hatred because of jealousy would likely occur. Additionally in a democracy we would be unable to stop Sharia Law occurring. Do you really hate your own race so much you wish to see it extinguished? Are you prepared to voluntarily give up your own country?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Bob says:

    Diana,
    You are not really a very good advert for the BNP’s education policy.
    Your grammar is appalling and you clearly have no understanding of how verbs operate. The word “would” is the conditional tense of the verb “to be” and it must take another verb to accompany it, such as “to have” or “to see”. In your first paragraph, you use the preposition “of” in conjunction with the verb “to be”. What you mean is “would have” and not “would of”.
    So far as you argument goes, you clearly haven’t read the above article. Presumably, because of the way you write in your critique, this is because you can’t read and write. May I suggest you go and receive an education before you enter into political discussion?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Diana says:

    Sorry for the grammatical errors, but I was educated under a ‘multiculturism is so great’ Labour government who believe that our own culture, which includes Jane Austen and William Shakespeare, is inferior to a backwards and retarded desert religion.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Bob says:

    As far as I am aware both Austen and Shakespeare are still studied by school children today. Islam is not considered as being superior to the literary greats. You are not comparing like by like. One is a religion the other is literature. Stop blaming the educational system and accept that you are just not capable of engaging in a serious political discussion. Engage don’t rage!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Spiney Norman says:

    “a backwards and retarded desert religion.”
    Couldn’t we say the same about Christianity? In fact, the old and new testaments contain far more scientific inacuracies, such as the universe being 6,000 years old, a man living in a fish and a talking snake. For every abhorrent instruction you can find in the Quran I will find you five in the bible. So we could say, objectively (I have no bias – I am an atheist) that Christianity is both more backward and more retarded than Islam.
    But nobody is suggesting that our children should be forced to receive an education based on the teachings of Islam. The BNP are, however, arguing that our children should receive a fundamentally Christian education, rather than the secular one advocated by ALL the mainstream parties.
    It is, therefore, the BNP and only the BNP who would suggest that “a backwards and retarded desert religion” is superior to our great, secular, literary heritage.
    (Apologies to any Christians who may be offended. I have no problem with Christians; My problem is with Christian chauvinists who seem to think that all other faiths are somehow “primative and barbaric” when compared to the lovely, fluffy Christianity. Cruisades anyone? Spanish Inquisition?)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Tree says:

    Have to say, I’m with Norman and Bob on this one.
    Religion is something that should not be dictated through politics. Most countries of the world nowadays adopt a secular approach to education, so as to give people a choice in their beliefs, therefore letting them give their own opinions as to what they think is and isn’t right, and obviously what they do and don’t believe. I, as another atheist, was given said choice, and I therefore believe now that science gives us a lot of answers that religion doesn’t. Because of this, I think that if we were to educate our children based upon the teachings of the Bible (for example), then there’d be a lot of education that would be missing, like the vast majority of science and maths, as well as aspects of other subjects. Surely, you’d prefer for your children to have as full an education as possible? Ergo, secularism would, and will, continue to be the way forward.
    Also, historically, you are horrendously inaccurate. When the Nazis came to power, they rigged the election so that no other party existed. Therefore, the German people at the time could only vote for Nazism, and so they didn’t have a choice, whereas the people of Britain do. If ever the BNP comes into power in the UK, then I’m leaving the country faster than you can say that I’ll need a Visa to get out.
    Another thing – the main reason that the crimes carried out by immigrants is so high, is because we don’t accept them into our communities. Therefore, they’re constantly feeling oppressed by a predominantly white nation that ostracises people from other races because the assumption is that white people don’t do anything illegal, and they never cause any problems in our country. Now, last time I checked, the Jeremy Kyle show’s only participants are all white, the highest amount of drug and alcohol abuse in the UK is carried out by white people, whites have the highest teenage pregnancy rate in the UK, and all of these are based on proportions, so it’s not just because there are fewer blacks and asians in the country either. Therefore, if anybody needs to get out of the country, it’s the whites, as we’re not running our country properly, and I’m included in that demographic!
    As well as this, we are a country of immigrants. When you look through our history as a nation, we’ve been invaded by Romans (i.e. Latin-based countries), Vikings (Scandinivians), Saxons (Germans), and Normans (Franco-Vikings), and then, after the 2 World Wars, we INVITED people to our country in order to boost our weak economy, promising them a life of luxury, when all we were ever going to do was put them in council houses, so I think we’d be more at fault than they would be for fucking our country up, wouldn’t you agree? Without immigrants, we wouldn’t have the country that is as successful as it is now, so if these people are going to aid us in the long run, then they can come to our country as freely as they’d like!
    Therefore, pretty much all of your arguments are flawed. As well as this, there are immigrants in our country that can speak better English than you, so by all means, be ashamed of yourself.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. Scot says:

    Hi Diana,
    you know you posted almost exactly the same comments to an earlier article.
    was this a mistake, or are you spamming?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0