Arthur Kemp
Arthur Kemp, the South Africa white supremacist ideologue and BNP foreign affairs spokesman, has said that the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s court case against the BNP’s racist admission policy is a “huge own goal” and will help the party to “destroy one of the biggest arguments against it”, namely that it will no longer be labelled as racist.
This is yet another indication of the BNP’s intention not to fight the EHRC to the “bitter end” as it fears it will run out of resources. The BNP believes, as Kemp said yesterday, the court case is designed to “use up party resources needed to fight the general election”.
Some are now arguing whether the EHRC have shot themselves in the foot over their handling of the BNP. Apart from squandering large amounts of taxpayers money and generating huge amounts of favourable publicity to the BNP, what have these proceedings achieved?
We already knew the BNP are a racist organisation and rule changes weren’t going to change that. (Why did the EHRC wait till after the Europen election? Why haven’t they enforced the rules on other bodies that enforce ethnic restrictions?)
The BNP, on the other hand, have gained a lot from this process. They now look like victims of a politically motivated attack and have turned a court case, designed to obliterate them, into a victory by announcing they can no longer be called racist as an organisation.
We believe this whole affair is a classic example of how not to defeat the BNP. You can not legislate organisations like the BNP out of existence. You can, however, seriously address the concerns of ordinary voters on issues like immigration, Islamism, job displacement and national identity.
“EHRC move against BNP is states biggest own goal BNP Wandsworth told” - BNP
Tags: Arthur Kemp, EHRC
YOU’VE ONLY GOT TO READ THE NEWSPAPERS TO HOW MANY VARIANTS THERE ARE ON 1 STORY,IT DOES’NT TAKE LONG TO SEE THEY’RE ALL LIARS,THATS WHY THE BNP WILL SHINE OVER THE OTHER PARTIES.THE BNP ARE KNOWN AS THE PARTY OF TRUTH.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
peggy you deluded little fascist
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
They have shot themselves in both feet. It’s nothing more than a thinly veiled politically motivated attack.
Bring it on.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
i’vr been playing a song by Roy Orbinson and i’m gona dedicate it to the Labour,Con-servative and Liberals…………….’Running Scared’
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
These comments are meant for discussing the issues raised in our posts, not for abuse so could you pls moderate your language.
Thanks
James.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
you have been warned peggy
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Only time will tell if the EHRC’s actions will prove detrimental to their cause, but the important thing to remember is that their cause – the EHRC’s – was as racist as you can possibly be: saying to a group of people it HAD to change its race.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Fellist, I don’t think the EHRC’s actions had anything to do with race. It may have been motivated by politics. Either way the EHRC, however politically correct it may be as an institution, aspires to promote social cohesion. The BNP, regrettably, openly attempts to wanting to promote division and is against the promotion of integration between different ethnicities.
If the BNP were to preach a more tolerant tune it wouldn’t be hounded in such a way.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Maurice, if it wasn’t about race the EHRC would have challenged the various groups devoted to the interests of particular ethnic minority groups or assembled ethnic minority groups excluding White people before challenging the ONLY organisation devoted to Whites.
This brings us to your “promotion of division and opposition to integration” — relative to 2009 we were fairly undivided and integrated in the 1940s, the EHRC is succesor to the ideology which destroyed that inheritance, and since it does not consistently “promote integration” or “oppose division” I see no reason to believe that its underlying agenda has changed.
The BNP on the other hand, are consistent, both at the local level, favouring free association for all people (even if they happen to be White); and at the global level, privileging the rights of native peoples over colonists (even if the natives happen to be White. This provides a direct contrast with not only the EHRC but alos with establishment parties who assume a racist double standard at both levels towars White peoples.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[sp.: "also" and "towards" -- note to self, check spelling before pressing "SUBMIT"]
Also, Maurice, tolerance – contrary to sales spiel – is not a value in itself but a negation of all values. I also note your incoherence: we will not tolerate the BNP unless they become more tolerant!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0