### here

Archive for September, 2009

Thursday BNP News round up

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

BNP Assembly Member Richard Barnbrook faces a 6 month ban

Richard Barnbrook

Richard Barnbrook faces 6 month ban for lying

Today the BNP’s Richard Barnbrook, Barking and Dagenham, is facing a six month ban for making up murder statistics.

After the BNP London Assembly Member made his claims through YouTube, the Metropolitan Police had discovered that there was no basis of truth as “there had been no murders or serious incidents in the time period cited”.

An independent investigation found that Barnbrook’s comments on YouTube about non-existent murders had showed “wilful disregard for the truth”.

Barnbrook’s disciplinary hearing was scheduled for July but was delayed when he claimed stress-related illness and was signed off work for two weeks.

We believe that Barnbrook’s case is a classic example of how the BNP will often lie and exploit the genuine fears of residents living in troubled areas for political gain. We think that the BNP would best serve the communities they represent if they were to actively promote social cohesion instead of division and fear.

“BNP politician Richard Barnbrook faces ban after ‘making up murders’” – The Times

BNP Midlands leader spoke at Neo-Nazi rally

BNP neo-Nazi rallyOn 12th September 2009, Mike Bell, secretary of the BNP’s West Midlands region, attended the Fest der Völker (Festival of Nations) in Pössneck, Germany, with three other BNPactivists. They included Dave and Nina Brown from Nottinghamshire, who were taking time out from campaigning for a Broxtowe District Council by-election on 24 September, where Dave Brown was the BNP candidate.

Leading neo-Nazis from across Europe spoke alongside BNP activists Bell and Brown at the racist rally. They included violent neo-Nazis from Sweden’s National Socialist Front, Germany’s National Democratic Party, Hungary’s Jobbik and other nationalist hot spots in Austria, Bulgaria, Switzerland and the Czech Republic. 

Despite Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons ( a former and dedicated member of Britain’s National Socialist Movement)claiming to the likes of Andrew Marr and Adam Boulton that their admiration for Adolf Hitler and Nazis are behind them, the BNPstill contain members such as Bell and Brown who continue to fraternize with neo-Nazis, Holocaust deniers and other violent extremists.

Midlands BNP officer speaks at German neo-Nazi rally – Lancaster Unity

Serbian Gay Pride event cancelled after neo-Nazi threats

A Serbian church defaced by Serbian neo-Nazis

A Serbian Gay Pride event was called off after violent threats were made against participants.

Members of of the violent ultra-nationalist groups 1389 (named for the year when Serbia lost to the Ottoman Empire in the Battle of Kosovo) and Obraz (the Serbian word for face) had been ratcheting up the temperature prior to the event by briefing the media.

Mladen Obradovic, a leader of Obraz, said: “Everyone knows what will happen if they go ahead with that parade of shame, and the responsibility for that will be of those who organized it. They cannot expect to poke their finger in the eye of our nation and go unpunished.” 

There are no known links between the BNPand Obraz and 1389. However, this is an example of the effects that racist and intolerantorganisations can have once they have managed to worm their way into the fabric of society. With the incremental rise of the BNP, we have to ask ourselves if this sort of nasty behaviour is what we want for Britain (a country where we take extreme pride in the values of fairness, tolerance and respect for one another).

Serbia scraps Gay Pride in Belgrade amid threats – TIME

BNP Arthur Kemp: ‘EHRC will help BNP’

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

 

Arthur Kemp

Arthur Kemp

Arthur Kemp, the South Africa white supremacist ideologue and BNP foreign affairs spokesman, has said that the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s court case against the BNP’s racist admission policy is a “huge own goal” and will help the party to “destroy one of the biggest arguments against it”, namely that it will no longer be labelled as racist.

This is yet another indication of the BNP’s intention not to fight the EHRC to the “bitter end” as it fears it will run out of resources. The BNP believes, as Kemp said yesterday, the court case is designed to “use up party resources needed to fight the general election”.

Some are now arguing whether the EHRC have shot themselves in the foot over their handling of the BNP. Apart from squandering large amounts of taxpayers money and generating huge amounts of favourable publicity to the BNP, what have these proceedings achieved? 

We already knew the BNP are a racist organisation and rule changes weren’t going to change that. (Why did the EHRC wait till after the Europen election? Why haven’t they enforced the rules on other bodies that enforce ethnic restrictions?)

The BNP, on the other hand, have gained a lot from this process. They now look like victims of a politically motivated attack and have turned a court case, designed to obliterate them, into a victory by announcing they can no longer be called racist as an organisation.

We believe this whole affair is a classic example of how not to defeat the BNP. You can not legislate organisations like the BNP out of existence. You can, however, seriously address the concerns of ordinary voters on issues like immigration, Islamism, job displacement and national identity.    

“EHRC move against BNP is states biggest own goal BNP Wandsworth told”  - BNP 

    

 

 

BNP to set up Afghanistan campaign

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

TalibanThe British National Party have said they will be launching a new anti-Afghanistan campaign. Paul Golding, a BNP Councillor, announced that the BNP were intending on focusing on the war in Afghanistan. Golding said the campaign would detail the “lies” told by the Labour and Conservative parties “to get Britain into Middle Eastern Wars, list the equipment supply failures since then, and end with a call to get all British troops out of Afghanistan as quickly as possible.”

The BNP also said the new initiative would be conducted similar to their “Racism cuts both ways” campaign, which sought to exploit the tragic murders of whites in Britain by falsifying details. The ”anti-racism” campaign listed 167 murders and stated they were all racially motivated against white Britons. However, it was discovered that only a handful had any racial element.

Over the last year, as more British troops have been killed or injured by Al-Qaeda and Taliban terrorists in Afghanistan, the BNPhave stepped up their anti-war rhetoric and have demanded that all UK forces be repatriated as they believe Afghanistan is not in our national interest. 

We believe, however, it is in our national interest to fight terrorists who used a baron land as a launch pad against the West on 11th September 2001 (which included the deaths of 67 Britons).

Populist foreign and defence policies and turning Britain into a fortress will not protect us from an enemy who are determined to take the fight to us, even if we are not prepared to take the fight to them.

As General Sir Mike Jackson, former Chief of the General Staff, said: if we want to protect ourselves from global terrorism “we must maintain our will in Afghanistan”. In other words, to pull out of Afghanistan, while it remains unstable, would seriously compromise our national security and be a deriliction of duty.  

“EHRC move against BNP is states biggest own goal BNP Wandsworth told”  - BNP