### here

Archive for January, 2010

Platform: MCB should also shoulder blame for extremism

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

Abdul Bari from the MCB

The Muslim Council of Britain has called on Alan Johnson MP the Home Secretary to do more about the rise in anti-Muslim hatred in the UK.

Abdul Bari, Secretary of the MCB, wrote:

“Amongst many British Muslim communities, there is a growing disenchantment at the lacklustre response from our political leaders to speak out against anti-Muslim hatred. Whether this exists in explicit form through the actions of far-right groups, or implicitly with hysterical headlines in our media, the policy response to any of these has been far from satisfactory.”

On the MCB’s web site Bari expresses his concern about last Saturday’s mini skirmish between the English Defence League and the police in Stoke-on-Trent. The MCB’s secretary didn’t mention the BNP by name but said: “We ask you to take leadership in this matter, especially in a year where divisive elements may well flourish in the run-up to the next general election.”

The MCB are right to raise the issue of the rise in anti-Muslim sentiment in the UK. There are nearly 2 million UK Muslims: a majority of whom are moderate and live ordinary lives.

In recent times the BNP have sought to exploit the growing legitimate concerns about the rise in UK Islamist activity by claiming that Britain is being turned into a Caliphate. To lend credibility to their cause, the BNP have deliberately sought to conflate Islamism with Islam. This has led to some very worrying trends developing in social cohesion, particularly in areas where there are large Muslim populations living alongside non-Muslim populations.

But the MCB should also accept some responsibility in the rise of extremist groups like the EDL and the BNP. The BNP are a reaction to a number of government policy failures including inequality, integration and immigration. Many people (not just white non-Muslims) have felt that the mainstream parties are responsible for them being culturally, economically and socially excluded from British society. But groups like the MCB, who claim to represent over 500 affiliated national, regional and local organizations, mosques, charities and schools, have also contributed to the rise of intolerance by legitimizing bigotries within their own ranks.

Daud Abdullah

A good example of this is Daud Abdullah, Bari’s deputy. Mr. Abdullah sparked controversy when he became a signatory of the Istanbul Declaration in 2009, which declared war on foreign naval vessels that sought to stop weapons entering into Gaza (at the time Britain’s navy had offered its assistance to the Israeli government). Mr. Abdullah has not been removed from his position as Deputy-Secretary General.

Mr. Abdullah’s alignment with a piece of paper that appears to authorize terrorist attacks against naval vessels, and possibly the British Navy, and the MCB’s refusal to distance themselves from him only helps to raise concerns about the effectiveness of Britain’s integration Muslims and plays straight into the hands of the BNP’s narrative of British Muslims acting like fifth columnists.

It should also be noted that Mr. Abdullah is also a senior researcher at the pro-Hamas Palestinian Return Centre, which Nothing British exposed in November for inviting Kristina Morvai MEP, a close associate of Nick Griffin’s in the European Parliament and leader of the Hungarian extreme right party Jobbik.  Mr. Abdullah’s name appeared – alongside Ms. Morvai’s – on a list of speakers who were due to address a pro-Hamas conference.

Kristina Morvai

Despite one of its senior officials being prepared to share a stage with a gypsy-baiter, whose party regularly makes anti-Semitic remarks, one hopes that the MCB are against not just anti-Muslim sentiments but also anti-Jewish and any other bigotries.

This seems unlikely.

In previous years the MCB have boycotted Holocaust Memorial Day. One hopes that in a time when the Holocaust denying Griffin becomes an MEP and when its memory is increasingly becoming a distant memory they attend it this year.

Maurice Cousins

White boys suffer under New Labour

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

Blair: "Things can only get better."

The Government’s 450-page report into inequality in Britain points to the failure of Labour’s 1996 pledge to raise the living standards of the poorest “by the end of its time in office”.

The “Anatomy of Economic Inequality in the UK” report describes Britain as a place where inequality and an enduring class system has trapped Britain’s poorest in a cycle of hopeless under-achievement.

Singled out most are white boys who are described as doing particularly badly under Labour where the study found that only 6% of those eligible for free school meals (i.e. any child whose parents earn less than £16,500 per year or are on benefits) went on to university. In the reports summary it found that those from minority ethnic groups with GCSE results around or below the national median are much more likely to go on to higher education than white pupils with similar results. Children with Chinese, Indian and Black backgrounds now have higher education qualifications than the equivalent White British population.

But despite these new trends nearly all minority ethnic groups are less likely to be in paid employment than white men and women. 44 per cent of Pakistani and 49 per cent of Bangladeshi women are economically inactive, because they are looking after family or home, compared to 20 per cent or fewer of other groups. Around 80 per cent of White British, other White (Irish, Polish etc), and Indian men are in paid work, but between 60 and 70 per cent of other groups.

This report is important for the liberal Establishment when it tries to understand the incremental rise in BNP support over the last five years. It clearly shows that the election of Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons to the European Parliament is not because because of some inexplipable  growth in intolerance towards minorities and seasonal resentment towards politicians.

It is because of the bona fide grievances about feeling socially, economically and culturally excluded from Britain (the report outlines the sense of economic isolation).

It is about the failure of government policy to address the adverse effects of cultural and economic globalisation on hard-working families who have lost their livelihood, their communities and their sense of security (the RDAs, the tax-credits, the skills councils, the  early schools intervention – well-meaning but ultimately ineffective, wasteful initiatives that have failed to provide real hope and employment for hard-hit families).

The government’s multicultural approach has also contributed. The immigration integration policy has exacerbated the creation of ghettos and the failure to give new arrivals a sense of Britishness. Multi-culturalism has provided the mechanics for many of the interventions that address inequality by defining someone’s needs by their religion or the colour of their skin (see post on the DLG’s Tackling Race Inequality report). These have made Britain more divided and fractured than ever before.

Nick Griffin and the BNP may seek to use these figures to their political advantage by saying that this prove that Britain’s white working class have lost out during a time of prosperity for the rest of the country. He is right.

However, he is wrong to suggest there is a conspiracy to cleanse Britain of its indigenous population. The problems in our society stem from government the policy failures to address very real issues facing hard-working families during an industrial revolution that has left many of them unable to compete in the world economy and uncomfortable in their own homes, and they should be held accountable for this.  

BNP allies draw up “enemies of Hungary” list

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

A member of Jobbik's Hungarian Guard

The Hungarian neo-fascist Jobbik party have drawn up a list of countries and international organisations it regards are “enemies” of Hungary. Gabor Vona, the leader of Jobbik and Prime Ministerial candidate for his party, said that he would come into conflict, predictably, with America, Israel and the IMF if his party was elected to power in the April 2010 Hungarian General Election.

Politics.hu reported the following:

“In a speech held in Esztergom over the weekend, Jobbik chairman Gábor Vona (also the party’s prime ministerial candidate) revealed what can be considered to be the party’s “enemies list”, origo.hu reports. If the party were to come into power, Vona said they would come into conflict with the IMF, United States and Israel in their bid to reform Hungary’s finances and economy, although he did not give specifics.”

In 2008 the IMF bailed out Hungary with a $15.7 billion life-line as part of a program designed to ease financial market stress in the former Soviet Republic, which has been hit badly by global financial turmoil.

Vona

Vona flanked by Guard members

Hostility towards the United States and Israel is a common theme throughout Europe’s neo-fascist network, as with their hatred for global institutions like NATO and in this case the IMF, which are seen as part of global Jewish conspiracy, or a New World Order as it is euphemistically referred to.

In recent times the BNP have tried to distance itself from its anti-Semitic past by claiming that it is a friend of Israel and Jews, but this hasn’t stopped it from publically associating itself with ultra-nationalists like Jobbik, Germany’s NPD, France’s Front National, Italy’s Forza Nouva, Sweden’s National Democrats and Bulgaria’s Ataka, all of which have a deep hatred for Israel, America and Jews.

The BNP’s kidding no one but themselves when they claim they have reformed their anti-Semitic and extremist ways, when it is clear to everyone else that they continue to have love affairs with Europe’s revolting fascists and enemies of Britain’s national interest?

For more information relating to Jobbik and its relationship with the BNP please read our briefing by clicking here.

Maurice Cousins