### here

Archive for February, 2010

Platform: The BNP’s appeal to those left behind

Friday, February 26th, 2010

IJO-12-05-09-JB-22

It is easy to blame the rise of the BNP on bigotry stirred up by the tabloid press. But the far bigger cause is government failure to deal with the genuine grievances of those left behind in modern Britain.

This week, a new campaign on the left, Expose the BNP , launched. Expose the BNP is an alliance of journalists, media workers and activists who join the growing consensus that just ignoring the BNP and trying to deny them the oxygen of publicity will no longer work. With two BNP MEPs sitting in Brussels, we need to take their ideas and politicians on. In this new environment, policies of “no platform” are not so much counter-productive (although they are) as irrelevant. In an online world, the BNP no longer needs the mainstream media to reach those left behind in modern Britain.

There is however a subtle but important difference of emphasis. There are those who take the view – as does Sunny Hundal in his article this week – that BNP support is kept alive by an inflammatory tabloid media playing up to the prejudices of disgruntled Britons. They believe that the best solution to stemming the rise in their vote is for the mainstream media to stop talking about immigration and the BNP to be shut out of political debate altogether.

And there are those of who believe that this ignores the genuine anger and frustration of the disaffected in our society. We won’t solve the problems of extremism unless we can give everyone a stake in the future of modern Britain. Ironically, the left seems more interested in berating its former voters than helping them.

While globalisation has brought unprecedented prosperity and diversity to many of our lives, there is part of our society that got left behind. As our manufacturing sector moved overseas, the skilled working class in places like northern mill towns found their jobs moved offshore or taken by better-skilled and hard-working immigrants. With their communities seemingly in terminal decline, and a political system obsessed with a tiny subset of fringe voters in the “golden triangle”, it is not so surprising that many voters felt they had nowhere to turn to in the mainstream political system.

This means politicians have to do what they’ve avoided for the last two decades, and actually listen to the concerns of working-class voters, not just patronise them. If you were trained to be a highly respected technician, it’s not so easy to take a job in a call centre or McDonald’s. Britain’s working class aren’t so much racist as seeing the communities they grew up in disappear. With little hope for the future, it’s not so surprising they turn to the BNP’s nostalgic view of the past.

It wasn’t the media that splintered Britain’s society, and neither is the real divide between whites and ethnic minorities. What matters is the gap between those who gained from globalisation, and those who were left behind – and the fault for that lies solely with our political class. Controlling the BNP needs more than a press strategy. It requires a complete mind-shift on the part of our politicians, and a commitment to tackle this problem head on.

James Bethell

This piece originally appeared here.

Why there’s Nothing British about the BNP’s “Christian values”

Friday, February 26th, 2010

05_08_5---Cross-on-a-Hill_web (2)Nick Griffin and the British National Party are keen to portray themselves as on the sides of traditional British culture.  They see a gap in the market that they can fill. While other parties surrender to multiculturalism, Islam, and politically correct secularism, the BNP stand up for traditional British Christianity. This is nonsense. There is nothing Christian about the BNP.

On the BBC’s ‘Question Time’ programme, British National Party leader Nick Griffin stated: ‘If Muslims do stay in this country they must remember that Britain is essentially a fundamentally British and Christian country’. The BNP is a ‘Christian’ party that can save ‘Christian culture’

The BNP have created a front organisation called the ‘Christian Council of Britain’, headed by BNP activist and electoral candidate Robert West who leads religious services at various BNP events, including the party’s ‘Red, White & Blue’ and reportedly preaches on topics such as ‘the importance of nationalism’ and how “homosexuals do greatly err”. For West, a multi-racial society is a form of ‘Holocaust’, with immigration used to create “Lebensraum” for the Third  World. Despite initially denying any connection with the BNP, West has admitted that the BNP “encouraged and facilitated” its establishment.

Why the BNP are not Christian

-          There’s nothing Christian about the BNP’s ethics. For Jesus Christ, humanity was all part of one family. Christianity from the outset taught a universal message which dissolved the idea of race or nation, teaching that it is of no significance to God. He said that we should love our neighbour, preach the good news and understanding to all nations. He taught the parable of the Good Samaritan, to show our true neighbours were not just those from the same race. Most of all, he abhorred violence and the hatred that is fascism’s speciality.

-          The BNP use Christianity as an excuse to attack Muslims. Rather than refer to the actual teachings of Christ, the BNP’s favoured role model are the Crusaders. In a letter, Nick Griffin wrote “We will never allow our children to become a minority in our homeland! We will fight to the bitter end, just like our Crusader ancestors, to preserve our Christian culture and heritage. The spirit of the Medieval Knights lives on in all of us!”

-          The BNP’s use Christianity as an excuse for their homophobia. British fascism has a history of extreme homophobia. While the party’s policy is no longer officially to ban homosexual activity, they are always keen to claim that homosexuals are an affront to Britain’s ‘Christian heritage’. 

-          The BNP’s real ideology is pagan. Christianity, of course, is a “foreign import”, and for the extreme activists within the BNP inner circle, like all other imports it must be purged.Odin

The BNP’s Foreign Affairs spokesman Arthur Kemp wrote in his March of Titans that “the introduction of Christianity has to count as the single greatest ideological catastrophe to ever strike Europe.”

Ever since Himmler’s obsession with the occult, there has been a strain of Paganism with fascism, as zealots attempt to reclaim a purely European religion.

Lee Barnes, the BNP’s legal director, is a particular fan: ‘Christianity is a semitic religion, it is creature [sic] of the deserts of the Middle East not the forests of the Northern Europe [sic] and its symbol the cross is an instrument of torture not of living redemption’. In place of Christianity, Barnes advocates Odinism, the worship of the Norse pagan gods of pre-Christian Europe, and he connects the Odinic ‘tree of life’ (Yggdrasil) with a religion based on race: ‘The roots represent our descent from the Gods and our connection to the Earth, the trunk represents our shared European racial heritage, the main branches of the tree our nations and tribes, the twigs on each branch represent each family unit and each single leaf symbolises an individual life’.

There’s Nothing British about the BNP’s ideas

Thursday, February 25th, 2010
isaac_newton

Issac Newton

The BNP claim to be a patriotic party, but seem ashamed or ignorant of one of Britain’s proudest contributions to the world – our ideas.

It’s not just the British language that you can hear in every country in the world, its the influence of our leading thinkers. Britain is the proud home of Newton and Darwin, of Shakespeare and Byron, of Isambard Kingdom Brunel and Tim Berners Lee.

Perhaps what we should be most proud of our political and economic ideas. Britain was the home of the industrial revolution, the greatest increase in wealth humanity has ever seen, finally freeing the world’s population from a life of drudgery on the farm. Just as importantly, we spread the idea of parliamentary democracy, of liberalism and government for the people.

The BNP’s influence on the other hand are European. Continental thinkers like Rousseau and Nietzsche. Continental philosophies of romanticism and existentialism. Continental political ideologies of fascism and nationalism. Continental economics of protectionism and corporatism.

Some of these ideas have some merit to them. Some of them were a disaster that lead to mass war and genocide. None of them are British.

British Ideas

-         Liberalism. British people believe in fair play and tolerance. That as long as you follow the rules, do you part and don’t hurt anyone, you can be part of our community. We believe that politics is important, but that it shouldn’t be an all encompassing religion. Ever since Locke and the Glorious Revolution, we’ve believe in checks and balances on power and gradual transformation, rather than violent revolution

-         Free markets. Britain is the home of Adam Smith, David Ricardo and David Hume. Our believe in open markets and free trade helped us become the richest country the world had ever seen. We believed in keeping bread cheap for the poor, rather than protecting greedy capitalists with captive markets.

-         Working with the world. Britain is the greatest country in the world – but that doesn’t mean we can just ignore everyone else. We don’t just believe in free markets, in our Empire we created the biggest free trade zone the world’s ever seen. We don’t just believe in freedom, we used our navy to put an end to the slave trade. Not least, we don’t believe in fascism – which is why stood alone against the Nazis in World War II.

BNP Ideas

-         Authoritarian nationalism. The BNP believes that the people is the nation is the state. If you’re parent and your parent’s parents weren’t born here, you can’t be one of us. Blood is everything. The tribe is greater than any individual. A strong central government is needed to lead us to greatness. Politics is all encompassing.

-         Corporatism. The BNP openly admit that they steal their economic ideas from Asian countries such as Japan, but in truth their ideas have been popular on the continent for much longer. The BNP believe in cosy dinners where government bureaucrats, rich industrialists and union leaders stitch up the future of the economy, rather than let individual workers and consumers decide. They believe in protection and regulation, tariffs and quotas and waiting lists. An economy closed to the outside world and searching after the past, rather than a dynamic, creative leader of the future

-         Fascism. The BNP like to pretend that they’re not a fascist party, but their ideas remain the same. Its not just the big ones, like hating people of different colours and races. It’s the economics, the politics and the superstitions. Both the BNP and the Nazis are corporatist, protectionist, have both nationalist and socialist influences, believe in a strong state, read Nietzsche and Heidegger, hate finance, are fascinated with environmentalism have both nationalist and socialist influences,  and Paganism, distrust modern art, want to censor the media, break up large retailers, institute national service, dislike America and the Jews,  and have leaders that admire Mein Kampf.

There is Nothing British about hating Churchill

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Churchill Photo

The BNP like to claim that Britain’s leading fighter against fascism Winston Churchill would have supported them and their “Battle for Britain” campaign.  Not only is this a laughable misinterpretation of history , but the BNP have also regularly showed their disdain for Britain’s greatest war time Prime Minister.

The BNP are trying to take advantage of the “Battle for Britain” spirit.

As Nothing British have highlighted, the BNP are regularly making use of World War II related imagery: the Spitfire, Churchill,  and the spirit of the Blitz.

When Nick Griffin was confronted about this he claimed:

“[Churchill] would have been full-square behind the British National Party”.

Simon Darby, the Deputy Leader of the BNP, also waded into the debate. Darby said that if Churchill was alive today he would be a BNP supporter. If Churchill:

“… was here today and had a choice of voting Tory or BNP I think he’d vote for us. He would have more in common with the BNP than with the Tories, that’s for sure.”

This, of course, is nonsense and has been attacked by Winston Churchill’s family on several occasions and by Nicholas Soames MP, his grandson, during Nothing British’s Stolen Valour campaign.

The BNP thinks we were on the wrong side.

In an undercover documentary for the BBC, Mark Collett, BNP publicity director and Sheffield BNP election candidate, said:

“Churchill was a f****** c*** who led us into a pointless war with other whites [ie the Nazis] standing up for their race.”

In a January 2010 BBC interview, Chris Beverley, Andrew Brons MEP’s chief of staff and BNP candidate for Morley, told the interviewer:

“I don’t hate Hitler.”

On Hitler’s Waffen SS Griffin praised their:

“… limitless courage and sacrifice”.

David Duke, a personal friend of Nick Griffin, blames Churchill for World War Two.

In January 2010, Duke carried an article called “How organized Jewry pushed America into WWII”. The article derogatorily describes Churchill as a “Jew lackey”.

Churchill despised all fascist leaders.

Sir Oswald Mosley was a friend of Adolf Hitler and the wartime leader of the British Union of Fascists, a Nazi sympathising party.

Nick Griffin has proudly said:

“There is a strong, direct link from Oswald Mosley to me.”

Even before the war Churchill attacked what he called the “Heil Hitler brigade in London society”, which included “those like Mosley who are fascinated by the spectacle of brutal power. They would like to use it themselves. They grovel to Nazi dictatorship in order that they can make people in their turn grovel to them.” Churchill regarded Mosley a Fifth-Columnist (a traitor) and felt “not the slightest bit of sympathy” towards him.

There is Nothing British about misogyny

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

There is nothing British about sexism, but the BNP’s attitude remains anti feminist and out of date.

The BNP is primarily concerned about race – what it terms as “preserving the indigenous population of Britain”. But it is also opposed to other forms of equality, such as gender.

From Enlightenment thinkers like John Stuart Mill to the Suffragettes, Britain is proud of its historical role in liberating women. We may have been a little slow to accept votes for women and property ownership laws, but Britain can say hand on heart that it has led the fight in promoting women’s rights.

The BNP claims – in the same way that it says having non-white members it is not a racist party – that because it has female candidates it is not anti-women.

The BNP’s Mini Manifesto says – among other things – it wants to:

  1. Implement a regressive taxation system that will re-establish women as dependents of their husbands.
  2. Repeal protection of witnesses in rape cases and reform family law to benefit men.
  3. Remove the right to choose to have an abortion.

Page 7 of the Manifesto says:

“Divorce and family laws and maintenance arrangements discriminate against men, and innocent men who are falsely accused of rape have their lives ruined while their lying accusers cannot even be named.”

Nick Griffin has said he doesn’t recognise womens rights, describing claims for equal rights between men and women as “feminist poison”.

The BNP has promoted misogynists.

In August 2005 Nick Eriksen – a former BNP candidate for the London Assembly – described rape as a “myth” and said “some women are like gongs they need to be struck regularly”. He wrote on his blog:

“I’ve never understood why so many men have allowed themselves to be brainwashed by the feminazi myth machine into believing that rape is such a serious crime… Rape is simply sex. Women enjoy sex, so rape cannot be such a terrible physical ordeal.

To suggest that rape, when conducted without violence, is a serious crime is like suggesting force-feeding a woman chocolate cake is a heinous offence.

A woman would be more inconvenienced by having her handbag snatched”

Eriksen was quickly removed from his post to prevent further embarrassment.

Nick Griffin will often tap into British pride about gender equality and point to extreme versions of Islam and their treatment of women. When asked about Islam, he told the Question Time audience:

“Because it treats women as second class citizens, because it says that a woman victim of rape should be stone to death for adultery … it doesn’t fit in with the way British society, free speech, democracy and equal rights for women.”

Griffin, however, applies a different value system when it comes to his members who write crude and hate-filled things about women.

In August 2009 Lee Barnes – the party’s Legal Director – wrote that “modern” women are “self loathing”, “sexless” and “androgynous” monstrosities. He said:

She is a monster, a sexless polymorphous perversion of nature.”

In a September 2008 blog post Barnes wrote an article that drew a moral equivalence between British soldiers and Nazi SS soldiers. He also called Rebecca Wade – former editor of The Sun – whose paper expose a ceremony in Austria as a neo-Nazi gathering for former members of the SS. He called Ms Wade a “Red bitch” and wrote:

“Leave the old men of Germany alone you Red Bitch.”

There is nothing British about hindering women’s rights and tolerating sexism and misogynism.

Maurice Cousins

Why there is nothing British about voting BNP

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

Nothing British is launching a new campaign on why there is nothing patriotic about voting for the BNP. This blog series will reclaim patriotism and British identity from the clutches of ethnic nationalists. It will show how rather than being patriotic – creating a common identity for all – the BNP is a party that seeks to divide Britain.

The BNP’s shameful use of respectable icons, symbols and institutions like Churchill, the Union Jack and the Church to cover up for the fact that it is a party mired in corruption, criminality and violence is a disgrace.

In no particular order, our new series will show how in Britain there is nothing British about:

  1. Exploiting wounded soldiers and veterans for political capital.
  2. Denigrating the contribution of non-white soldiers.
  3. Admiring the enemies of Britain.
  4. Selling out British interests to foreign extremists.
  5. Abusing the Queen and the Royal Family.
  6. Using authoritarian and wealth-destroying ideas from the Continent.
  7. Roughing up journalists.
  8. Tolerating misogyny, sexism and homophobia.
  9. Sneering at injustice.
  10. Accepting anti-Christian behaviour.
  11. Romancing foreign fascists.
  12. Denigrating our heritage.
  13. Breaking the law.
  14. Destroying individual identities through collectivisation.
  15. Dividing our country.
  16. Isolating Britain from our friends.

Patriotism, as George Orwell defined it, is a “devotion to a particular place and a particular way of life, which one believes to be the best in the world but has no wish to force on other people.”

The BNP, however, is not devoted to our “particular” way of life. It is committed to its own hate-filled, racialized version of Britishness. Nick Griffin’s political vision is un-patriotic. It looks backward not forward. It is closed not open. And it is divided not united.

During the European elections nearly 1 million British voters were so concerned about their future they decided to vote for Nick Griffin and the British National Party. For a country that is a tolerant and respectful believing in fair-play, this was deeply shocking.

Nothing British’s Policy Focus series has already exposed the BNP’s loony policies and shows how Nick Griffin - among other things – would:

  1. Cost jobs, particularly amongst the working classes.
  2. Push up prices and reduce choices for consumers.
  3. Divide Britain into an apartheid state.
  4. Isolate us from the our friends around the world.

Put simply: this series will show how voting for the BNP is about as British as voting for Sinn Fein, Anjem Choudhury or Fidel Castro

Police eyes on white supremacists – vigilance urged by MPs

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

Nothing British, in partnership with the Centre for Social Cohesion, have published a report by Edmund Standing and Alexander Meleagrou-Hitchens that highlights the potential threat from white supremacists committed to an agenda of violence against racial minorities.

Read the Blood_&_Honour report here.

The report is covered in today’s News of the World, here with Patrick Mercer MP calling for greater vigilance.

Denis MacShane MP writes in the forward to the report,

“Like their jihadist counterparts, neo-Nazis are filled with hate, are conspiratorial and are prepared (and determined) to use extreme violence to achieve their political aims. If we want to reduce the threat we face from far-right extremism, it is imperative that new systems be put in place, allowing pre-emptive strikes against this budding threat.”

The report lists three incidents of recent neo-Nazi-related threats:-

● In July, Yorkshire police raided a neo-Nazi terror cell with international links. They seized the largest suspected terrorist arsenal since the IRA bombings of the early 1990s. Twenty properties were raided and over 300 weapons and 80 bombs were discovered by counter-terrorism detectives. The hardware included rocket launchers, grenades, pipe bombs and dozens of firearms. Several people were charged, and over 30 were questioned over the incident.

● In September, Neil Lewington, a follower of B&H, was jailed indefinitely for attempting to launch a bombing campaign against non-white Britons. In his flat, police discovered a bomb-making factory and neo-Nazi literature. Court reports said that Lewington wanted to emulate his ‘heroes’ – David Copeland, the Soho bomber, and Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma bomber.

● In May, Terence Gavan, a card-carrying member of the BNP, was arrested after police raided his home. In January 2010, he was convicted on terrorism charges and sentenced to 11 years in prison, after a stockpile of nail and ball-bearing bombs, shotguns, improvised explosive devices and pistols was found at his house.

It is important not to overstate these neo-Nazi anecdotes. Britain is not about to turn into the Fourth Reich. Al-Queada remains the bigger threat.

However, it is important that we remain vigilant towards people with an ideological commitment to creating violence between people of different races. In 2001 security services tracked young Islamist radicals at outward bound camps that seemed harmless at the time. Four years later, some of those men had become terrorists who sought to kill innocent civilians on July 7 and 21, 2005.

We must not make the same mistake again.

BNP members are switching to the NF, says Politics Show

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

BNP is apparently losing members to the National Front.

Watch here.

I am not sure what the National Front thinks it has to gain from inviting a legal case from the EHRC.

Policy Focus #20: Britain Under the BNP

Friday, February 19th, 2010

Policy Focus

The BNP claim to be the only party unafraid to stand up for Britain and ordinary British working families. While the ‘LibLabCon’ is in thrall to the global elite, the BNP will put Britain first. They’ll restore us to a disciplined society, with plenty of manufacturing jobs to be proud of and protect us from the instability of the wider world.

If only we were to stop giving money to bankers and foreigners, the BNP promises, then everything would be alright. There would be plenty of jobs to go already, and higher wages. The British brands from our childhood like Woolworths or Cadbury’s wouldn’t have to shut down or change. When there wasn’t so much swearing on our tv or crime on our streets. Everything could return to the good old days, the days when Britain was strong, successful – and white.

It’s not wrong to say that things have changed, or that some people have been left behind in the new Britain. But by rushing to pick out easy villains, the BNP have missed the real causes of the tensions we’ve seen, and in the process they’ve landed on exactly the wrong solutions.

To maintain their racial and national separatism, the BNP would shut us off from the wider world. But it’s a profound mistake to believe that that would make our lives safer or more stable.

But as we’ve seen over the last four weeks, our country and people are too integrated into the wider world to just turn back the clock. The end result of the BNP’s policies would only be to splinter our country, and the cost would fall disproportionately on the worse off.

Let’s remind ourselves of the key effects:

-          their protectionism would cost each of £1300, cause long waiting lists for the latest gadgets, clothes and medicines and create a blander, poorer Britain

-          their tax break for the rich would be funded on the back of a massive increase in the prices of goods for ordinary British families

-          their authoritarian crime and immigration polices would tear our communities apart, and pour assault rifles onto our streets

-          their isolationism would turn Britain into a pariah in the world,  with no influence on the big cross border issues such as terrorism and climate change

-          their lack of credibility would send the cost of debt soaring, and lead to cuts in schools, hospitals and the army

As long as the BNP realise their dream of turning the clock back on Britain to the 1950s, of restoring us to a whites only country, they can probably live with the resulting economic devastation. To the hardcore ideologues at the heart of the BNP, racial purity comes first.

But you if want a party that cares about the same things you do, that’ll stand up for interests and your jobs, you should vote for someone else.

Read Policy Dossier #1

dossierthumbnail2

dossierthumbnail3

dossierthumbnail4dossierthumbnail5dossierthumbnail6

Policy Focus #19: What the BNP’s policies tell us about their party

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

nick-griffin--124446977349902700

The BNP’s policies us everything about

-          Populism. Nick Griffin and the BNP will promise everything to everyone, and are careful always tell their audience what they want to hear. Taxes lowered, spending up, deficit down. Restore law and order, and bring back the death penalty. The only people to lose out supposedly are foreigners, bankers and welfare scroungers. It is not easy, but in the long run politicians have to be honest with the British people, and say who will lose out.

-          No credibility or detail. In order to get away with this cheap populism, the BNP are carefully never to go into exact detail as to how their priorities would be implemented, or how much they would cost. They don’t expect to be in power, so why should they worry?

-          Inconsistency. Even so, occasionally this populism leads them into being inconsistent. Will the BNP protect only key ‘strategic’ industries or will they make sure every company remains British? They want to strangle the city with new red tape, and yet are against strangling regulation. They’re worried about peak oil and fuel shortages, but vow never to raise the duty on petrol. They attack socialists, but would nationalise vast swathes of British industry. What exactly do the BNP believe in?

-          The scapegoat strategy. To the BNP the source of whatever problems we might have are always easily villains: the pigs or banksters, foreign workers or immigrants. In the BNP’s head, all you have to do is get rid of the villain to get rid of the problem. Complex socioeconomic issues don’t seem to exits.

-          Nostalgia. The BNP hates modern Britain: hates its culture, its art, its people and its business. It is easy to moan that everything is going downhill, but not all change is bad.

-          Lack of patriotism. And at its heart, this represents the fact that the BNP isn’t really a patriotic party. If you’re proud of your country, you don’t want to hide away from the rest of the world. If you’re proud of your country, you don’t think we have anything to fear from opening ourselves up and competing with the best in the world. If you’re proud of your country, you believe our best is still to come, not retreat into the past.

Voting for a political party is not just an expression of your anger or identity. It is about endorsing a specific programme for the country, an agenda of change.

The BNP is trying to portray itself as a modernised serious party, but its political programme shows otherwise. This is not a question of ideology, or even their racial separatism. There is about a basic bar of credibility that any political party has to meet to deserve the voters trust, and the BNP falls far below it.