### here

Posts Tagged ‘Question Time’

Nick Griffin still to complain over QT

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

Almost a month after he vowed to make a complaint to the BBC about his controversial appearance on QT, BNP leader Nick Griffin MEP has still to make an official objection.

The Guardian reports that despite Griffin promising to lodge a complaint at what he claimed was the “unfair” way the Question Time programme was produced, the BBC has not received a formal complaint.

Simon Darby also said at the time that the BNP planned to put in a freedom of information request to the BBC and programme-makers to ask about the process of changing the format of the whole programme. “[We want to know] why they felt they had to break with the usual format,” the Darby added.

EHRC’s BNP poll: useful return to reality, but still understates the problem

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

First the fear, then a sigh of relief, now the return to reality.
 
In the first major piece of new polling insight since BNP-QT, The Sunday Times’s David Leppard (a former-colleague of mine) has first sight of a Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) poll that says that BNP support in their core-vote communities like Stoke and Blackburn is set to rise by about 50% to 18%. 
 
Some points:
 
1) The anger and frustration is still bubbling away.

After Griffin’s stumbling performance there was a temptation to hope for the best. That’s it. The worst is over.

In fact, BNP leader’s poor delivery on the night does not somehow miraculously defuse the sort of anger and frustration that readily feeds off the BNP’s brand of family-friendly racism and extremism.

Five drivers of this anger and frustration are particularly important.
 
a) In the heartland of Britain economic pessimism is still growing, despite the feel-good factor returning elsewhere in the economy. For instance, the manufacturing sector is still shedding jobs and public sector restraint is beginning to be felt at the front-line.

b) The Home Offices immigration regime is widely felt to be unfair, a sensation that is now being felt not only at the work-place and but also at the Job Centre. Mainstream parties refuse to address the issue, even in the run-up to the election, to the immense frustration of those who are losing out.

c) The EDL’s fortnightly marches, though often a damp squib, keep Islamism and “Islamification” in the headspace of these communities. Politicians are not trusted to solve this problem.

d) The war in Afghanistan – an important struggle of historic proportions – is increasingly confusing to voters and public support is falling. The BNP are taking a counter-intuitive, populist anti-war position. 

e) Westminster’s reluctant efforts to clean up its act are a national embarrassment that re-inforces the sense of disenfranchisement felt by Britain’s dispossessed.
 
Despite his evidently poor debating skills and distasteful world vision, Griffin is far from a busted flush. 
 
2)  BNP support has spread beyond the pockets studied by the EHRC

A feature of the current “post-globalisation” burst of fascism – Britain’s fifth such burst in 100 years – is the use of the internet by the BNP to reach beyond the pockets of core-support  in the Thames corridor, northern ex-mill towns and the West Midlands.

New BNP offices are being set up in unexpected places like Scotland and events are held in places like Salisbury, Thetford and Cheltenham. New communities are being targeted, such as veterans, agricultural workers and Christians.

The EHRC are wrong to focus their pollsters on a few areas because the politics of fear and resentment are seeping into dispossessed communities throughout the country – the results will be seen in the 2010 local elections when we’ll see red-white-and-blue victories spread like German Measles across the map in places around the country which have never seen the BNP before.
 
3) Westminster elections are not safe

It is an easy assumption that our first-past-the-post system is some kind of guarantee that prevents yucky extremists like the BNP from ever plonking their fat bottoms and cheap suits on the green leather at Westminster. This is probably still the case – they are unlikely to win a seat next year barring a disaster like the implosion of the Barking Labour party (this is a possibility). However, the hold the mainstream parties have on the country’s votes is diminishing – they had less than two-thirds of the overall vote in June ‘09 – as special interest parties (UKIP and the Greens) and regional-representative parties (eg SNP and Plaid Cymru) chisel away. The BNP are a mixture of both. In some three/four-way seats a candidate might win with less than 10,000 votes or less than 20% of the votes cast. The BNP are on 18% in three constituencies, according to the EHRC.
 
If the mainstream parties remain so highly focused on relatively few swing seats in Middle England, they could easily let extremists slip in the cracks where no one is paying attention.

Are the BNP about to chuck Griffin?

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

This morning’s article in the Times which says that BNP supporters are calling for Nick Griffin MEP to go after his much-maligned performance on QT last week should be treated with caution.

NG’s performance last week was certainly under-whelming for someone who had shown promise in recent appearances such as Andrew Marr and Adam Boulton. Many members will feel disappointed. However, NB doesn’t think a leadership contest is on the cards:

1. The panel for The Times’s poll was recruited from Stormfront, a well-known and notoriously wacky white supremacist forum where many members regard Griffin as a “sell-out”. It is not reprsentative of BNP members, informal supporters or voters. In fact, in our experience the membership/supporters are very committed to Griffin.

2. The BNP rules largely support Griffin’s hold on the party.

3. There is no obvious successor or agititator for change. Lee Barnes, the BNP’s legal officer is a senior, officeholder in the BNP, but his political judgement is regarded as suspect, even by the BNP leadership. His blog, 21st Century British Nationalism, regularly embarrasses the party with its anti-Semetic, homophonic, Nazi-sympathising articles.

Richard Barnbrook is apparently a leadership contender. Barnbrook is popular, particularly in the South, but he is not regarded as able to grasp a brief (his performances in the London Assembly are regarded as unimpressive). He is accused by his enemies of having a drink problem (this is a funny video of Barnbrook dancing at a wedding).

Andrew Brons MEP, a man with a history of neo-Nazism and racial hygiene theory, is also being muted as a possible contender. But his age and lack of mainstream appeal count against him.

Simon Darby, BNP deputy chairman  and head of press, is probably the strongest performer in the BNP hierarchy. In 2006, Darby was lined up by Griffin to take control of the day-to-day running of the BNP if he was found guilty of incitement to racial hatred. But he is currently a Griffin loyalist and lacks any visibility outside the party.